THE END OF BGLOS (http://gregoryparks.net/wordpress/?p=63)
Author - Gregory Parks
First: To call someone “paper” or a “skater” is taboo, but the reality is that the current generation of college students is more entitled and less inclined to sacrifice for achievement than prior generations, on average. And that fact will only become amplified with time. I think a person who loses his or her sight, has to get skin grafts on their posterior, or has their kidney ruptured may have strong grounds to sue for hazing-related injuries. Such victims in the past would have been less-likely to sue, because they would have accepted such injuries as part of the hazards that went along with pledging a BGLO. Even more, this new generation may be more inclined to sue for even milder harms or real/perceived slights. Indeed, we live in an increasingly litigious society.
Second: In a study my colleagues and I conducted on over 1,300 BGLO members, we found that BGLO hazing has become more violent at least since the 1950s. More violence likely means more injuries, and more injuries likely mean more lawsuits against BGLOs. In another study, my colleagues and I found that BGLOs have more violent hazing than white fraternities and sororities. Black fraternities are the most violent. Part of this likely has to do with constrained notions of masculinity among black men, including black fraternity members. And given that black fraternities likely will not have any meaningful dialogue about masculinity and black fraternalism, they will not likely sort these issues out, especially as they relate to hazing. As such, hazing will remain particularly violent within these groups.
Fourth: BGLOs have too many blind spots when it comes to hazing. Most of the organizations do not pay attention to the legal trends. Most of them do not pay attention to broader bodies of knowledge that could aid them in addressing the issue proactively or once litigation arises. They do not mine the data they already have on past litigations and likely do not share such information across organizations. As such, they fail to capture the big picture either in strategies that plaintiffs’ counsels have used against BGLOs, the ebb and flow of the law in the area, types of evidence that has been or not been useful in litigation, best practices, arguments that expert witnesses and trial consultants have made.
Fifth: Similar to number four, BGLOs are information/data adverse. This includes bodies of knowledge that are available outside of the respective organization files. I have attended the Fraternal Law Conference two years in a row. Most BGLOs are not represented there. Arguably, there has been more research on BGLO hazing conducted in the past five years than on any other type of organization. However, I would bet that most BGLO members and leaders have never looked at this research to see how it may aid them in addressing this issue within their own ranks. Part of this has to do with organizational politics. For example, given the petty intra-organizational rivalries between the groups, do you think Kappa Alpha Psi leadership would consult with a Phi Beta Sigma researcher on BGLO hazing? I doubt it, because they won’t consult with a Kappa, like Dr. Ricky Jones, who has researched the issue. What about vice-versa? Nope! Phi Beta Sigma has never even consulted with the only Sigma, Dr. Matthew Hughey, who currently studies the issue—ironic given that they have a national, anti-hazing initiative. These organizations do not solicit feedback, certainly not on a regular basis, from non-BGLO hazing experts or even BGLO members who are hazing experts, even within their own ranks. The ironic thing about BGLOs is that, for the most part, they have tremendous intellectual capital, given the nature of alumni membership within these groups, but the vast majority of this intellectual capital goes untapped. So, BGLOs remain in an information vacuum due to their own actions or inactions.
Sixth: In one study my colleagues and I conducted, we found that a determinant of hazing was the extent to which BGLO members were truly aware of sanctions associated with hazing. Arguably, most do not know how bad the problem is or how high the stakes truly are. Leadership within BGLOs seem to believe that their current efforts are the best possible, and they are not. Telling BGLO members that hazing will destroy BGLOs is very different from laying out the case systematically and regularly. But that all turns on having sufficient information—e.g., aggregating the major hazing incidents across BGLOs, resultant injuries, lawsuits, settlement/judgment figures, criminal convictions—to make such a case. But, as I have said, BGLOs do not keep such records, and to date they have not invested in gathering and consolidating such information. I suspect that given their indifference to information consolidated and analyzed by outside sources, even those efforts would be snubbed. With all that said, BGLO members are woefully under-informed about hazing, its nature, and the challenges it raises. And these very members are expected to either create and reform the Membership Intake Process within their own organizations or vote on its form and application.
In the end, I am hopeful about the longevity of BGLOs but not optimistic. Their demise will be blamed on 19-23 year-olds, but how responsible can you expect “kids” to be, even those who espouse high ideals? The end of BGLOs will ultimately have resulted from the failure of the adults, especially those in leadership, from doing, not simply something(s) about hazing, but all that needed to be done. Within BGLOs, there is not the will to be transformative. These are inherently conservative organizations where new modes of thinking are strenuously resisted, organizational politics prevails, and provincialism rules the day. Only time will tell; but time is not on their side.
About the author:
Gregory Parks is an Assistant Professor of Law at Wake Forest University School of Law, where he has taught since the Fall of 2011. Professor Parks holds an M.A., an M.S., and a Ph.D. (all in Psychology) and a J.D. He served as a law clerk on the District of Columbia Court of Appeals to The Honorable Anna Blackburne-Rigsby and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to The Honorable Andre M. Davis. After clerking, Professor Parks took a Visiting Fellowship at Cornell Law School and then worked as a Litigation Associate at McDermott, Will & Emery LLP in their Washington, D.C. office where he worked on trial and appellate matters.
Professor Parks' research interests lie in a number of domains: (1) how social and cognitive psychology explain legal phenomena; (2) the application of empirical methods to legal questions; (3) race and law issues; and (4) the ways in which black fraternal networks intersect with the law. He teaches in the areas of civil procedure, social science and law, as well as race and law.
Professor Parks’ scholarly books have been published with Oxford University Press, The New Press, the University Press of Kentucky, the University Press of Mississippi, and Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. He recently completed two books - one entitled The Wrongs of the Right: Race and the GOP in the Age of Obama with Matthew Hughey (NYU Press) and another on implicit/subconscious race bias and the law (Oxford University Press). In 2013, he will turn his attention to writing two books - one on hazing within black Greek-letter organizations through the lens of law and other disciplines; another on the myriad challenges that face black Greek-letter organizations and how to solve those problems.
His scholarly articles have appeared in such journals as: Florida State University Law Review; Howard Law Journal; University of California-Irvine Law Review; University of Pennsylvania Law Review (PENNumbra); Cardozo Law Review de novo; Wake Forest Law Review Common Law; Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy; Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology; Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class; Rutgers Race & Law Review; William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law; Hastings Women's Law Journal; and Psychology, Public Policy & Law.
Professor Parks is member of a number of professional (i.e., law- and social science-related) and fraternal organizations. His hobbies include martial arts (Karate (black belt), Tae Kwon Do (red belt), Gracie Brazilian Jujitsu (blue belt), Small Circle Jujitsu, kickboxing, Judo, and wrestling) and travel.
A few responses:
You have been in existence for over 100 years and your primary operating income is initiation, then you deserve what you get or what you are getting. If you have not put together a plan to sustain your organization with the thousands college grads not to mention all the legal minds, educators and business owners that exist in these organization. 2014 and you are still looking to initiation i.e. 18-22 year olds to carry your organization financially. Then, well, I hate to say, excuse me but leave the keys in the mailbox and good night.
This blog hits home big time. Hazing is serious and detrimental to all BGLOs. We can lay out the facts and the financial side of how this would ultimately shut us all down and someone will still believe ‘they have to be brought in RIGHT!’ No matter what anyone says it all comes down to individual decisions. As a member of a BGLO I’ve seen first hand how this practice destroys the chapter and everyone involved. It’s not worth it. If it continues (and it will) were going to go from the divine nine to the divine none.
To me, the elephant in the room is Black people inadvertently promoting white supremacy by calling themselves “Black Greeks.” The Africans on the Nile were the teachers of the Greeks and responsible for so-called Greek philosophy. We know that Pythagoras spent 21 years sitting at the feet of black people to receive his education. Most of the first Greek “philosophers” received their education in Africa. That is the major reason they were prosecuted for teaching a “foreign” doctrine. Dr. George G. M. James’ masterpiece, “Stolen Legacy” clearly proves beyond a reasonable doubt that: “The Greeks were not the authors of Greek Philosophy, but the people of North Africa, commonly called the Egyptians.” It should be a requirement that each Alpha brother reads, at a minimum, Stolen Legacy. The question is: are we as men, knowledgeable enough about who we are to embrace Africa and our ancestors who left us the Medu Neter (Words of God) to follow? The Medu Neter contains all of the wisdom and knowledge that black men need to resurrect themselves back to be the giants they once were when they ruled the ancient world. That is why our ancestors left Medu Neter on the walls and doorways of ancient African temples: “Know Thyself.”
Stephen Washington says:
Good stuff. I’ve been advocating that all BGLO should come together for collective survival and:
Suspend all undergraduate intake temporarily (one academic year)
Use that time to come together to share best practices and come up with a
common set solution options including alternative collective risk management strategies.
Consider using using more internet technology in the undergraduate intake process. (that’s right, online intake….you heard it here first)
Eric Woods says:
Interesting read. While I disagree with some of the details, I do agree with the overall “head in the sand” indictment of the leadership of these organizations. I have said may times within my own network of BGLO friends (I am an initiate of Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity Incorporated & quickly approaching my 25th anniversary since being a Scroller) that the new intake process is crippling. It hasn’t solved the liability issue and it exacerbates the issue of entitlement since there is no sacrifice required. To that end, paragraph 7 resonates greatly.
You do a good job of outlining the problems, but you haven’t put forth any potential solutions. What say you on that front?
Lastly, you might want to investigate integrating Discus for comments. That way, a discussion can ensue that will allow dialogue to flourish.
Follow to article